Difference between revisions of "Talk:Generating Wetness Indices for Watersheds in GRASS"

From CUOSGwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'The introduction could use some references.')
 
(removed coursework-specific comments)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
Suggestions for further refinements of this tutorial:
The introduction could use some references.
 
  +
  +
== In "Setting up your workplace" section - re: Importing DEM data ==
  +
  +
What format was the original data in? Do you have general tips for users for getting and importing this kind of data?
  +
  +
== Re: coordinates used, e.g. when specifying an outlet location ==
  +
  +
* remember, the coordinates could be in other systems - in your project you used UTM (MTM?), so northings and eastings are appropriate, but there are other possibilities - could make instructions more general
  +
  +
== Slope ==
  +
  +
When you generate slope maps, they can be in degrees or percent slope. Point this out to the user?
  +
  +
== Wetness Index ==
  +
  +
* would be useful to explain a bit more what you are trying to do here (what the index is used for), and why there is a 2.718282 in the formula (natural logarithm)

Latest revision as of 08:28, 5 March 2012

Suggestions for further refinements of this tutorial:

In "Setting up your workplace" section - re: Importing DEM data

What format was the original data in? Do you have general tips for users for getting and importing this kind of data?

Re: coordinates used, e.g. when specifying an outlet location

  • remember, the coordinates could be in other systems - in your project you used UTM (MTM?), so northings and eastings are appropriate, but there are other possibilities - could make instructions more general

Slope

When you generate slope maps, they can be in degrees or percent slope. Point this out to the user?

Wetness Index

  • would be useful to explain a bit more what you are trying to do here (what the index is used for), and why there is a 2.718282 in the formula (natural logarithm)